Yesterday Matt Zimmerman wrote:

 | I don't see the point of ripping JPEG support out of libgd.  The reason I 
link
 | rrdtool the way I do is that Debian contains a package for the gd library,
 | version 1.8.4, as well as libpng and zlib.  It would be inappropriate to link
 | rrdtool with a different version of this library than the one used by the 
rest
 | of the system.

as long as you life in a system where you have a large set of
sharedlibraries with all tools in-sync this is fine ... in a large
environment like the place where I work (hundreds of workstations)
all running software of the same server ... this is not the case
... (http://sepp.ee.ethz.ch) ...

 | Actually, I have noticed that the old libgd package (with GIF) support has 
been
 | resurrected in a new package in Debian (with a different library name) to
 | support programs like rrdtool which require the GIF version of the library.  
I
 | intend to link the next upload of rrdtool against this library, and restore 
GIF
 | support and compatibility with vanilla rrdtool.

wonderful

tobi
 |
 |

-- 
 ______    __   _
/_  __/_  / /  (_) Oetiker, Timelord & SysMgr @ EE-Dept ETH-Zurich
 / // _ \/ _ \/ / TEL: +41(0)1-6325286  FAX:...1517  ICQ: 10419518
/_/ \.__/_.__/_/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ee-staff.ethz.ch/~oetiker


--
Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help        mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive     http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-developers
WebAdmin    http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi

Reply via email to