Snippets of Wisdom Deleted
> How about having the rrd format changed so that at the beginging > of the rrd we have some size specifiers which tell how large the > data area of each DS definition is ... this would allow to create > some sort of forward compatible system which can skip DS types it > does not understand ... I'd also be interested in discussing (if this is up for discussion) adding the ability to generate user-customizable data fields in the header of the RRD. I'm envisioning a handy place to store something like sysName and sysDescr for the device you are polling. Ideally, this ends up as extensible, but only minimally so. Does this fall within the bounds of something that we're collectively interested in? Lemme know, Shane O. ======== Shane O'Donnell OpenNMS.org -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-developers WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
