> Today Gellatly, Laurie wrote:
>
> | So a change to rrd_fetch.c of:
> | 168c168,169
> | < if(cf_conv(rrd.rra_def[i].cf_nam) == cf_idx){
> | ---
> | > if((cf_conv(rrd.rra_def[i].cf_nam) == cf_idx) ||
> | > (rrd.rra_def[i].pdp_cnt == 1)){
> | (the line numbers may be wrong due to the older version
> I'm running)
> | would be a reasonable change?
>
> with the current crop of consolidation functons this is a save bet
> ...
But for 1.1.x the consolidation functions for aberrant behavior
detection will break
this code (i.e. they have the 1 PDP/CDP), so this should NOT be part of
1.1.x.
Jake
Jake Brutlag
Network Analyst
Microsoft WebTV
--
Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-developers
WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
