Yesterday Petri Helenius wrote: | Tobias Oetiker wrote: | | > I do agree that other parts of rrdtool can and will profit from | > having the data massaging facilities available in a module separate | > from rrdtool graph, but at the same moment I do not see why this | > would require rrdtool graph and a potential rrdtool report to be | > removed from the main body of the application ... | > | I think what would be useful is to be able to feed the graphing part | with variety of datasources, instead of just the builtin file format.
yep, this is certainly a point to consider, but I guess you want to feed your data to the part which does data massage also, not only to the grapher cheers tobi | Pete | -- ______ __ _ /_ __/_ / / (_) Oetiker, ETZ J97, ETH, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland / // _ \/ _ \/ / phoneto:+41(0)1-632-5286 faxto:+41(0)1-632-1517 /_/ \.__/_.__/_/ mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://people.ee.ethz.ch/~oetiker -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-developers WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
