On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 07:39:01AM +0100, Tobias Oetiker wrote: > Yesterday Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > How about creating a different cookie for float_cookie to indicate > > that the RRD is architecture-independent? At configure time, we > > could check whether the system has xdr routines, and if so, compile > > in support for architecture-independent RRDs (in which xdr would be > > used). > > Exactly ... this is what I have been trying to tell you ... I assumed, > that by encoding the cookie with xdr you would get a special value > anyway, but having a exlicit xdr cookie may be even better, just in > cas the xdr float format is 'almost' the same as the native format on > some architecture.
OK, we are talking about the same thing then. I thought you meant the RRD_COOKIE rather than the FLOAT_COOKIE. I seem to recall reading that rrdtool was in CVS now...is the repository open for public access? Or should I start from the 1.0.33 sources? -- - mdz -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-developers WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
