> From: Richard A. Steenbergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Instead of having to go from: > CPRINT:inoctets:MIN:"%f" > to > VDEF:inmin=inoctets,MIN > CPRINT:inmin:"%f" > You should be able to do something like: > VPRINT:inoctets,MIN,8,*:"Bits %f" > > Where MIN is a VDEF function and not a Consolidation Function, if I > understand this system correctly. The goal is to eliminate unnecessary > creation of a vname and thus avoid a cluttered namespace.
I disagree on this (which doesn't make it wrong!) because PRINT is not doing any calculations and IMHO it should stay that way. What do others think please? Another way of aproaching this problem is to allow an RPN string everywhere a variable is allowed now, this wouldn't make the xPRINT series an exception. > And just to throw in a bug report, there is a mismatch between the > rrdgraph_examples(1) manpage and reality, the PERCENTILE command is > documented as 95,name,PERCENTILE when in actuality it is > name,95,PERCENTILE. Oops :) cheers, -- __________________________________________________________________ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ | work private | | My employer is capable of speaking therefore I speak only for myself | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Technical questions sent directly to me will be nuked. Use the list. | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | http://faq.mrtg.org/ | | http://rrdtool.eu.org --> tutorial | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-developers WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
