Pavel Mores wrote: > I tried to follow the formal time syntax specification (in parsetime.c) > while making my changes. > > Excuse me, but is "yyyymmdd hh:mm" supposed to be a valid > TIME-SPECIFICATION? Generally, if we don't use offset TIME-SPECIFICATION > is basically TIME-REFERENCE. Roughly speaking, TIME-REFERENCE is a > TIME-OF-DAY-SPEC followed by either of the DAY-SPEC flavors. So it > seems to me that the correct syntax should really be "hh:mm yyyymmdd" > but then again, I might be wrong.
This format does indeed seem to be an exception. It is however specified as, and I quote, "not quote standard, but I love this ..." in the documentation. It has been around a long time and it has the advantage that it is an auto-sorting time specification. I would really regret to see it go away, but if I'm alone ... cheers, -- __________________________________________________________________ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ | work private | | My employer is capable of speaking therefore I speak only for myself | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Technical questions sent directly to me will be nuked. Use the list. | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | http://faq.mrtg.org/ | | http://rrdtool.eu.org --> tutorial | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-developers WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
