Tobias Oetiker wrote: > well the problem here realy is backward compatibility. If we switch > to xml, then everything becomes VERY different. Also new > possibilities arrise in the sense that we will for example be able > to use a different legend placement paradigm where it is more based > on tables ... but then again looking at what most people do with > rrdtool xml seems like overkill ...
Something good, something bad. <hint> It doesn't seem to be very important to others or else there would actually be some traffic on this list ... </> cheers, -- __________________________________________________________________ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ | work private | | My employer is capable of speaking therefore I speak only for myself | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Technical questions sent directly to me will be nuked. Use the list. | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | http://faq.mrtg.org/ | | http://rrdtool.eu.org --> tutorial | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-developers WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
