Michael T. Babcock wrote: > What I'm trying to consider "out loud" below, is the direct representation > of a current rrdtool graphing description in XML. The other option (in my > mind) is to move the 'defs' out of the way and describe them within the > chart/label entries directly (like my previous XML file did).
Without claiming that I can do it: wouldn't it be relatively easy to write a conversion routine in rrd_graph.c that converts "old-style" commands and options to xml? Backward compatibility is then guarantied and if new stuff is only supported through xml most users will convert fast enough :) regards, -- __________________________________________________________________ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ | work private | | My employer is capable of speaking therefore I speak only for myself | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Technical questions sent directly to me will be nuked. Use the list. | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | http://faq.mrtg.org/ | | http://rrdtool.eu.org --> tutorial | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-developers WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
