Tobias Oetiker wrote: > yep you are probably right ... things are pretty messy as they are > now ... feel free to change things ...
Let's first discuss the basic outlines because this is going to have quite some impact. Also, I'm not confident *I* can properly setup the necessary directory, recursive make, automake and so on. > after all we may still include the c files into 1 big one if needs > be. freetype does this ... You mean: #include "anotherpart.c" ? I do this often when I'm hacking rrd_graph. Then I include the function back into rrd_graph when I'm done. The benefit of doing it the proper way (compiling separate functions, not including them) is visible when the program needs to be recompiled after a change. cheers, -- __________________________________________________________________ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ | work private | | My employer is capable of speaking therefore I speak only for myself | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Technical questions sent directly to me will be nuked. Use the list. | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | http://faq.mrtg.org/ | | http://rrdtool.eu.org --> tutorial | +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-developers WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
