Peter Stamfest wrote: > On Mon, 24 Mar 2003, Ian Holsman wrote: > > What do you think about the overall design of the thread-safety stuff? Did > it provide for all that was needed to get you going on win32? What could > be improved?
I haven't really started pushing the thread-safety stuff yet. the only thing I could have used API'wise is a application_init/application_term call so I could put the global initialization stuff in, but I don't think RRD actually has this, so I had to resort to calling the init function every call (just like your pthread implementation calls pthread_once every call). (the next step for me is to get the perl-interface working, as it was crashing for me on linux, and I like the NT Debugger/IDE better) ps.. I don't think the NT version of localtime is re-entrant, as you can't pass a block of assigned memory to it. --Ian > > peter > > > -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/rrd-developers WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
