On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 04:36:16PM -0700, Lee Thompson wrote: > I'm not sure if this issue has been covered before in > this forum.
Yes it has. > When you write a program that updates rrd files at > adhoc intervals, non-contigous updates are dropped. No, they don't. They are treated exactly the way you have asked them to be. Yes, you. > What I mean by non-contiguous is a sample that is > several samples in the future to the last sample > written to rrd. I spent some time tracking this > problem down. You might have saved some time by RTFM. > I would prefer that rrdtool would detect this "fill > in" situation and automatically null out the prior > data and preserve the new update value. This would > make client rrdtool programming easier. I think you need a drawing program, not a data logger. I also think that patch destroys much of what rrdtool is about. Last but not least I wonder why you are writing this on the developers list, you being a user. Alex -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/rrd-developers WebAdmin http://lists.ee.ethz.ch/lsg2.cgi
