Rafael Martinez Torres wrote: >>>The problem is that we have to work around a bug in the Debian INET6 >>>module. Specifically, if you call IO::Socket::INET6->new() without >>>specifying a remote address, INET6.pm will create an IPv4 socket, and >>>IPv6 won't work. > > Then ( and only then ) this will be bug on INET6.pm
Yes, it is a bug in INET6.pm (the Debian version). >>>The workaround for this bug is to specify the host and port in the >>>IO::Socket::INET6->new() call. But this causes the "reply from different >>>IPv6 address doesn't work" problem. So you can't just use a different >>>INET6, you have to modify both INET6 and SNMP_Session. > > Did you ckeck my INET6.pm then ? If mine is sucessfull, then it would be > easier to use the correct one than hacking the SNMP_Session. If we use your INET6.pm, we have to change SNMP_Session.pm as well. > Please, I think you are replying to "mrtg-developers-bounce". I didn't > reach this message but forwareded by Tobias. No, I sent it to mrtg-developers, with you in CC. You can see it in the archive: http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg-developers/msg00161.html > Yes , I will try in the next hours... I have to investigate how the > www.cpan.org works... searching the correct list...There are many... Wait, before we do this it might be a good idea to contact the Debian maintainer, Masahiro Omote. Maybe he is interested in maintaing INET6.pm on CPAN as well... Regards, Lorenzo -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Help mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg-developers
