> I think that I am not quite understanding the issue... the > output from > the script is relative, so the period of a kernel tick not really > relevant. Essentially, the result is a dimensionless number. > > Have I missed your point about accuracy? >
hmm that's true.. I am still confused by the whole thing.. So you set the "gauge" option so mrtg doesn't divide by the elapsed time? I guess adding up all the kernel ticks including idle time will give total ticks.. allowing to generate a relative percentage of time spent in each tick type. Which is basically what cpu usage % is.. I guess.. Mike -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg FAQ http://faq.mrtg.org Homepage http://www.mrtg.org WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
