It's always 2.... That's why, I though that it had to mach the interface number..
Thanks for your help!!!! Brandon -----Original Message----- From: Peter Glanville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 12:14 PM To: brandon.baker Subject: RE: [mrtg] Cisco 7206 - 64 bit counter works on one interface, bu t not anoth er? No, I'm saying when you did search-and-replace "2" to "4" for the interface number, it also altered the ::::2 to ::::4, which MRTG does not understand and ignores. Edit the target line back to 2's instead of 4's and it'll probably do what you want. Regards Peter Glanville Network Analyst, ICtS, Canon (UK) Ltd "brandon.baker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "'Peter Glanville'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] onics.com> cc: Subject: RE: [mrtg] Cisco 7206 - 64 bit counter works on one interface, bu t not anoth er? 04/08/2003 17:08 Are you saying that I should only have four (:) colons in the non-working interface? The reference says five colons and the config that is working is using five colons as well. Brandon -----Original Message----- From: Peter Glanville [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 12:02 PM To: brandon.baker; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [mrtg] Cisco 7206 - 64 bit counter works on one interface, but not anoth er? > Can you think of any reason why 64 bit counters will work great on one > router interface, but not another? <snip> > This one still wraps: > Target[non-working_TOTAL-AGGREGATE]: -4:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:::::4 + > -4:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:::::4 + 4:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:::::4 + > 4:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:::::4 ::::4 Four???!!!! More care with that search&replace in future Peter -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg FAQ http://faq.mrtg.org Homepage http://www.mrtg.org WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
