Good points all around Daniel. We are using 14all but that isn't to say the others don't meet many needs. And we have a topology based graphical front end for slick navigation with infraMon.
Cheers, Woody... http://www.inframon.org - infraMon: Network Infrastructure Monitor http://www.micro-mess.com/forum/ - infraMon Questions/Discussions -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel J McDonald Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 2:38 PM To: Phil Iovino Cc: mrtg Subject: [mrtg] Re: 14all vs mrtg-rrd vs routers.cgi On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 20:06, Phil Iovino wrote: > Any advice on which to use? The colors of the graphs, overall look, and > configurability is very important for us. I use routers2.cgi because it has a very nice, browsable interface to find things. I use rrd_mrtg.cgi because it doesn't require ? in the url, so it works well with Big Brother, but navigation is a pain. I used 14all.cgi to learn a lot of perl tricks, particularly with the mrtg_lib.pm module, which hasn't always been as documented as currently, so seeing a great example of it in use in 14all.cgi was a big help to my own mrtg extensions. -- Daniel J McDonald, CCIE 2495, CNX Austin Energy -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg FAQ http://faq.mrtg.org Homepage http://www.mrtg.org WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
