> > [ Incidently if you follow the examples at the site above it may be out of > > date as far as CPU usage monitoring. Cisco seemed to change the MIB where > > one could monitor the CPU usage after a particular revision of IOS 12.x. > > They announced that change in 10.3! So, we've had 8 years to switch to > the new and improved OIDs. Why are people still using the old > cisco-monolithic mib? Are there that many people running 10.2.6 (the > last stable release of IOS, before, say, 11.1.24cc) still? >
Sorry I don't claim to be a cisco expert, I checked the doco from the Cisco site before implementing the monitoring to check I was using the correct values and it said: http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk362/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094a94.shtml Starting with Cisco IOS® software version 12.0(3)T, the CISCO-PROCESS MIB and its objects: cpmCPUTotal5min (.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.109.1.1.1.1.5) cpmCPUTotal1min (.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.109.1.1.1.1.4) cpmCPUTotal5sec (.1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.109.1.1.1.1.3) are used to replace the avgBusy5, avgBusy1, and busyPer objects from the OLD-CISCO-CPU MIB, respectively. This indicated a change in version 12.x. Jim -- Unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Archive http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/mrtg FAQ http://faq.mrtg.org Homepage http://www.mrtg.org WebAdmin http://www.ee.ethz.ch/~slist/lsg2.cgi
