There could be some problems with counter wrap too. Granted....far less common when enabling SNMPv2 but it still exists. I don't think there is any way for MRTG to know when one of the 3 counters wraps around when using this format.
Another option would be to use routers2.cgi (thanks Mr. Shipway) to draw the graphs. That way you could still have the individual graphs then use a user define graph that combines the output into one pretty graph. Paul On 11/21/07, Luis Carlos Solano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Scott Baker wrote: > > If this were a SINGLE router I'd just add ::::2 on to the end. I'm not > > sure how/if you can do that with something like this that's added up. > > Is it possible? > > > > you must use the ::::2 in every target. I have something like this, > working: > > > Target[total]: /ipaddress1:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:::::2 + > /ipaddress2:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:::::2 + > /ipaddress3:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:::::2 > etc... > > Regards, > > Luis Carlos. > > > _______________________________________________ > mrtg mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/mrtg >
_______________________________________________ mrtg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/mrtg
