Jonathan Williams spake thusly:
> A traffic generator is set to produce unidirectional traffic at a
> constant rate of 11.6Mbps, fed in to eth0 on my router, and looped back
> to the generator on eth1. I am polling ifInOctets and ifOutOctets on
> both interfaces on 2 second intervals through the management port of the
> router.
>
> The graph I would expect to see would be a flat line for ifInOctets on
> eth0 at 11.6Mbps, and a correlated flat line at 11.6Mbps for ifOutOctets
> on eth1.
>
> Predominately, this is what I see. However, once every 3-4 minutes there
> is a dip in the graph. The dip generally spans 1 or 2 intervals in
> length, and is on the order of magnitude of approximately 1/2 to 1/10th
> of the expected value. I have verified that this is not a dip in the
> actual traffic by querying the hardware directly on the router and
> observing that across the dips in the graph, the delta between the
> direct queries remains constant.

A two second interval is extremely short! 8-o

I would suggest you check the obvious firstly
- Are you using SNMPv2?  If not, do so, if possible.
- Are you generating so much test traffic that the SNMP packets are being 
dropped?
- With a 2sec interval, this can mean that the interval is smaller than the 
SNMP timeout or retries time.  Any delay would cause data to be skipped, and 
possibly interpolated or set to zero (do you have unknaszero set?)  Maybe your 
MRTG server has slow disks that cannot keep up with the IO stream and it needs 
to freeze occasionally to flush the output buffer, missing data polls?

I am guessing that the odd dips are when the counter wraps around, or rather 
when the MRTG or RRD code thinks it /might/ have wrapped around.  Setting to 
SNMPv2 will make this less frequent and less likely, although a 2sec poll is 
unlikely to be wrapping until some crazy number of gigabits per second.  Maybe 
the MRTG wrap detection code gets a bit dodgy at these high poll frequencies?

If using SNMPv2 makes the dips disappear or occur less often, then it is 
probably a wraparound-detection error.  Similarly, if the dips disappear with 
lower poll frequencies then it might be because the normalisation routines get 
upset then the buckets are so small?  I'd need to pore over the code for hours 
to deduce any possible misbehaviour when the interval is so small.

Hope this helps,

Steve

_______________________________________________
mrtg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/mrtg

Reply via email to