The way we achieve this is for the network admins to put the connected host 
name into the port description on the switches.  Then, cfgmaker pulls out the 
port description which is placed in the Target definition for the link names 
and titles and so on.  It also allows our snazzy config tool to parse through 
the links and putt Routers2 crosslinks between the Targets to link the port 
graphs and the host graphs, but you'd have to take care of that yourself.


Steve

________________________________
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lyle Giese
Sent: Tuesday, 5 August 2008 08:58
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [mrtg] (no subject)

Rodge Stumbaugh wrote:
I am new to mrtg. The previous network admin setup a network bandwidth 
monitoring application using mrtg and I noticed that most of the ,monitoring is 
through the switch port that the servers are connected to..is this the best 
practice? Also, if I want to make changes to correct where I see that several 
servers are no longer in service and some servers have been assigned to 
different ports than what is set up in mrtg, is it easier to change the inc 
files and the html for the monitoring site or is it better to accomplish this 
through the config maker?

Thanks,
Rodge






________________________________






_______________________________________________

mrtg mailing list

[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/mrtg


Config maker will setup monitoring for the ports on the switch, but it won't 
have a clue as to what is attached to which port on the switch.  You need to 
hand edit the files made by config maker for that information.

Includes are better than one big mrtg.cfg file, esp if you grow and decide to 
use routers2cgi and rrd later.

Lyle Giese
LCR Computer Services, Inc.
_______________________________________________
mrtg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/mrtg

Reply via email to