On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 15:45 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The problem I immediately ran into was my graphs continued to be drawn > out of whack. The scale started reporting speeds in GB/s and I > suspected perhaps MaxBytes needed an adjustment but haven't read any > other messages suggesting it should be adjusted beyond the > 125MBytes/second that cfgmaker uses by default.
Correct. MaxBytes is the same irrespective of the counters used. > I'm also suspecting that perhaps rateup isn't able to handle graphing > the values calculated based on 64-bit counter values. I have not seen any bugs in that regard, but I also haven't used rateup in the past decade (well, maybe in 1999, but I think it was 1998 that I made the switch and haven't looked back.) > So, I'm working around the problem by dividing the result I get from > my target by 100,000, leaving MaxBytes as 125000000, and my graphs > look a little bit more sane. > > Am I running into the problem solved by using a 64-bit version of > rateup? Doubtful. gigabit interfaces have been around a very long time. -- Daniel J McDonald, CCIE #2495, CISSP #78281, CNX Austin Energy http://www.austinenergy.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ mrtg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/mrtg
