Actually I didn't use cfgmaker. I'm generating the config files using a perl script that I wrote using data (hostname, community, interface, maxbytes, title, etc.) from a MySQL database that I've been using successfully for years. It's just recently that the system has started failing to find the interfaces when querying devices using SNMP v2. No changes were made to the mrtg binary when this issue started cropping and it's happening across multiple devices.
Thanks, Jeffrey Smith Network Engineer, CCNA Neonova Network Services (919) 460-3330 On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 5:58 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Send mrtg mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/mrtg > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of mrtg digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: SNMP v2 issues with queries (Daniel McDonald) > 2. Calibrating ssCpuRawUser etc to percentages (Frank Hamersley) > 3. Server 2012 (Turner, Megan) > 4. MRTG 2.17.4 rateup WARNING on Windows Server 2012 > (Clouser, Jennifer) > 5. Re: MRTG 2.17.4 rateup WARNING on Windows Server 2012 > (Steve Shipway) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 21:44:28 -0500 > From: Daniel McDonald <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [mrtg] SNMP v2 issues with queries > To: mrtg <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <cd88eabc.5e77c%[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" > > > > > On 4/8/13 5:06 PM, "Jeffrey Smith" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I have the following configuration: > > > > > > Target[mrtg_nns_3034]: \GigabitEthernet4/2:[email protected]: > ::::2 > > #Target[mrtg_nns_3034]: 6:[email protected]:::::2 > > Ok, so you ran cfgmaker with --ifref=ifnum, then changed the targets to use > descriptions. > What do you get if you run cfgmaker with --ifref=descr? > Personally, I find --ifref=name to be the most usable method. > > > -- > Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP # 78281 > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:29:49 +1000 > From: "Frank Hamersley" <[email protected]> > Subject: [mrtg] Calibrating ssCpuRawUser etc to percentages > To: <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > I am trying to calibrate the new CPU counters like ssCpuRawUser (50), > ssCpuRawNice (51) and ssCpuRawSystem (52) without much success. > > Whilst mrtg is reading the registers the movement recorded in the log is > often 0. The few entries shown here were caused by a demanding task that > vmstat averaged at about 10% utilisation however mrtg only inferred 1% and > 2%. > > root@terabite:/var/www/mrtg# head -10 fw_cpu.log > 1365584642 965303 759068 > 1365584642 0 0 0 0 > 1365584343 0 0 0 0 > 1365584100 0 0 0 0 > 1365583800 0 0 0 0 > 1365583500 0 2 1 3 > 1365583200 1 2 1 3 <--- this entry analysed > 1365582900 0 0 1 2 > 1365582600 0 0 0 0 > 1365582300 0 0 0 0 > > Extracts taken from the logs and analysed were ... > > timestamp raw-I raw-O delta-I delta-O log-I log-O > 1365582900 964380 757278 56 50 0 0 > 1365583200 964660 757880 280 602 1 2 > > The config I am using is ... > > # > # Firewall CPU > # > Target[FW_cpu]: > .1.3.6.1.4.1.2021.11.50.0&.1.3.6.1.4.1.2021.11.52.0:[email protected] + > .1.3.6.1.4.1.2021.11.51.0&.1.3.6.1.4.1.2021.11.55.0:[email protected] > Options[FW_cpu]: growright, nopercent > MaxBytes[FW_cpu]: 400 > Title[FW_cpu]: Firewall CPU Load > PageTop[FW_cpu]: <H1>Firewall CPU Load</H1> > Unscaled[FW_cpu]: ymwd > ShortLegend[FW_cpu]: % > YLegend[FW_cpu]: CPU Utilisation > LegendI[FW_cpu]: User > LegendO[FW_cpu]: System > # > > Is this an interplay of bits versus bytes affecting scaling? I think this > machine has 2 cores but I expected that would inflate the number rather > than > deflate it as I am seeing. > > Cheers, Frank > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 11:27:05 -0700 > From: "Turner, Megan" <[email protected]> > Subject: [mrtg] Server 2012 > To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > < > 4e017e8859597c41a131769b68c07c300108a9684...@admex1svr.asd.auburn.wednet.edu > > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Has anyone had success with installing MRTG on Server 2012? > > Megan Turner, MCSE, MCTS > Network Engineer > Auburn School District #408 > 915 4th Street NE > Auburn, WA 98002 > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://lists.oetiker.ch/pipermail/mrtg/attachments/20130411/d693e0ed/attachment-0001.htm > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 13:54:59 -0700 > From: "Clouser, Jennifer" <[email protected]> > Subject: [mrtg] MRTG 2.17.4 rateup WARNING on Windows Server 2012 > To: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > < > 4e017e8859597c41a131769b68c07c300108a9680...@admex1svr.asd.auburn.wednet.edu > > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hello, > > I am wondering if the rateup.exe program has fundamental problems with > Windows Server 2012. When running MRTG and the configuration file, we > receive the error - > > ***************************** > The description for Event ID 1000 from source MRTG cannot be found. Either > the component that raises this event is not installed on your local > computer or the installation is corrupted. You can install or repair the > component on the local computer. > > If the event originated on another computer, the display information had > to be saved with the event. > > The following information was included with the event: > > 2013-04-11 10:58:56: WARNING: rateup (C:/mrtg-2.17.4/bin\rateup > c:\mrtg-2.17.4\mrtgdata\ 164.116.160.254_177 1365703136 -Z u 1875258338464 > 1034527035513 125000000 c #00cc00 #0000ff #006600 #ff00ff k 1000 i > c:\mrtg-2.17.4\mrtgdata\164.116.160.254_177-day.png -125000000 -125000000 > 400 100 1 1 1 300 1 4 1 "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M" 0 i > c:\mrtg-2.17.4\mrtgdata\164.116.160.254_177-week.png -125000000 -125000000 > 400 100 1 1 1 1800 1 4 1 "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M" 0 i > c:\mrtg-2.17.4\mrtgdata\164.116.160.254_177-month.png -125000000 -125000000 > 400 100 1 1 1 7200 1 4 1 "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M" 0 i > c:\mrtg-2.17.4\mrtgdata\164.116.160.254_177-year.png -125000000 -125000000 > 400 100 1 1 1 86400 1 4 1 "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M" 0) did not work: Bad file > descriptor > ************************************ > > Upon inspection of the rateup.exe file - the server indicates it is > "incompatible". Be assured, there is no permissions problem with the > program accessing the directory indicated. > > Thank you. > > > > Jennifer Clouser > Chief Technical Advisor, Technical Services Manager > Department of Information Technology > Auburn School District #408 > 915 4th Street Northeast > Auburn, WA 98002 > 253-931-4940 (phone) > 253-931-8006 (fax) > Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > Change is a process, not an event. > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://lists.oetiker.ch/pipermail/mrtg/attachments/20130411/21fb2f16/attachment-0001.htm > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 21:58:21 +0000 > From: Steve Shipway <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [mrtg] MRTG 2.17.4 rateup WARNING on Windows Server 2012 > To: "Clouser, Jennifer" <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Message-ID: > < > 7294716191a1e142b80615ed2c633bca68272...@uxcn10-2.uoa.auckland.ac.nz> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312" > > Is it possible that you have a 64bit Windows 2012 and the 32bit rateup.exe? > Check where you obtained the binary from, you might be able to get a > version > compiled for a different version, or compile it yourself. > > > > Although I don?t know as much about Windows (UNIX/Linux person here mainly) > I?ve seen similar issue with executables compiled for earlier versions of > Windows running under later versions. I believe there are also > compatibility options you can set on an executable within Windows to make > it > more likely to run? > > > > Another option you might like to consider is using MRTG with RRDTool as the > backend ? then you don?t need rateup. > > > > Steve > > > > _____ > > Steve Shipway > > ITS Unix Services Design Lead > > University of Auckland, New Zealand > > Floor 1, 58 Symonds Street, Auckland > > Phone: +64 (0)9 3737599 ext 86487 > > DDI: +64 (0)9 924 6487 > > Mobile: +64 (0)21 753 189 > > Email: <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] > > P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail : ?????? > ??????????? > > > > > > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://lists.oetiker.ch/pipermail/mrtg/attachments/20130411/22202b1d/attachment.htm > -------------- next part -------------- > A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > Name: smime.p7s > Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature > Size: 5900 bytes > Desc: not available > Url : > http://lists.oetiker.ch/pipermail/mrtg/attachments/20130411/22202b1d/attachment.bin > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > mrtg mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/mrtg > > > End of mrtg Digest, Vol 76, Issue 2 > *********************************** >
_______________________________________________ mrtg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/mrtg
