oh wow, thanks! I (obviously) hadn't noticed that at all. That provides a clue, cheers
On 3 March 2016 at 20:57, Wm. Josiah Erikson <[email protected]> wrote: > I can't help but notice that the below says you're using SNMP v1, which > doesn't support 64-bit counters. The question is why is MRTG trying to > use SNMPv1 with that config, which isn't immediately clear to me, since > you have :::::2 in the right place (I did exactly what you did a few > years back and have had no issues with it). I would use cfgmaker to poll > those hosts and compare the configs they make with what you made > manually to find the difference. > cfgmaker [email protected]:::::2 for instance... > -Josiah > > > -Josiah > > On 3/3/16, 1:54 AM, Darren Murphy wrote: > > Received SNMP response with error code > > error status: noSuchName > > index 2 (OID: 1.3.6.1.2.1.31.1.1.1.6.2) > > SNMPv1_Session (remote host: "a.b.c.d" [a.b.c.d].161) > > community: "my_community_string" > > request ID: 1687324163 > > PDU bufsize: 8000 bytes > > timeout: 10s > > retries: 1 > > backoff: 1) > > -- > ----- > Wm. Josiah Erikson > Head, Systems and Networking > Hampshire College > Amherst, MA 01002 > > _______________________________________________ > mrtg mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/mrtg >
_______________________________________________ mrtg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/mrtg
