Thanks, I want to monitor approximately 100 network devices such routers and switches. If you guess I should use a bigger CPU, tell me what you think. Your recommended configuration. Because I haven't asked yet. And when ask, it will be difficult to change or add more hardware. Thanks, On Jun 2, 2016 6:21 PM, "Steve Shipway" <[email protected]> wrote:
That server looks a bit low in CPU, but it depends on what you’re monitoring (you have still not provided a number of actual metrics to monitor, though you indicate they are likely all to be SNMP which is much more efficient). I would definitely suggest you use RRDCached in front of RRDTool; it greatly improves the disk IO and responsiveness. If you do not use rrdcached, you may find that the machine fills its outbound disk queue and periodically freezes while trying to flush this. However, it all depends on your disk speed and many other factors, so you will need to tune it as you go. Steve *Steve Shipway* T: +64 9 3737 599 ext 86487 E: [email protected] *From:* mrtg [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *thomaz portella *Sent:* Friday, 3 June 2016 6:35 a.m. *To:* McDonald, Daniel (Dan) <[email protected]> *Cc:* [email protected]; Wm. Josiah Erikson <[email protected]> *Subject:* [FORGED] Re: [mrtg] Minimum hardware Look this server I thought: Look this configuration I assembled. 2x XEON CPUs (single core). 8GB RAM 4x 73GB SCSI HDs (RAID10) Red Hat MRTG Routers2 CA eHealth RRDtool
_______________________________________________ mrtg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.oetiker.ch/cgi-bin/listinfo/mrtg
