Hi Guys, I think it's good to try and have at least a 1:N mapping from JIRAs to commits, but not necessarily vice versa.
Cheers, Chris On Mar 29, 2011, at 7:47 AM, Aaron Kimball wrote: > related: does there still need to be a 1:1 mapping from commits to JIRAs? > - Aaron > > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Eric Sammer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I don't have a strong opinion and I think for something like mrunit it >> makes sense to default to commit. I like review first for larger commits, >> but I'm happy to leave it to the individual's best judgement. >> >> >> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Aaron Kimball <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Hey folks, >>> >>> It was my understanding that in the Hadoop community, all patches had to >>> get >>> a +1 on the review before being committed, even those from long-time >>> committers on the project. The new committer guide [1] suggests that being >>> a >>> "committer" on a project implies that you should commit first. >>> >>> How would we like to go about this here? >>> >>> >>> [1] http://www.apache.org/dev/new-committers-guide.html >>> >>> Thanks, >>> - Aaron >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Eric Sammer >> twitter: esammer >> data: www.cloudera.com >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: [email protected] WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
