Michael, first off, in case you've not seen this paper, I found it during a search for something else...
http://kokkinizita.linuxaudio.org/papers/aeolus-pres.pdf Basically, it's a presentation he did in 2004 to the Linux Audio community about the design of Aeolus. Might be helpful, probably not anymore. Now, I've read most of the very long thread, and I certainly don't know what Fons' problem is, except for ego. He claims that '...both [forks] are taking Aeolus in a direction I do not approve of' but without clarifying what his disapproval is. Miwarre was only experimenting for himself, and I don't think the MuseScore team has made any major coding changes except for your latest reconfig of the stops, which may or may not be wanted upstream. I do agree with the first responder that, regardless of strictly abiding to the GPL license, we don't want to be seen as renegades and so some contact is necessary, along with an explanation of MS' use of Aeolus. -- View this message in context: http://dev-list.musescore.org/Aeolus-Organ-Synth-tp7578364p7578377.html Sent from the MuseScore Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Mscore-developer mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
