In fact the challenge is to manage to be ideal for both use cases

The current implementation works well but:

1/ It's not easily discoverable. We could add a menu entry for the M
shortcut. We could expose the (un)break mmRest property in the inspector
when one or more measure are selected.

2/ Find a way to make it easier to create mmRest manually without
destroying the ease of use we have right now. Marc's proposal is a step in
the right direction. Maybe the (un)break property of measures could be a
styled property. So the user can set it at once for the whole score. Any
change would be kept, just like for other styled properties.


lasconic


2016-03-15 10:50 GMT+04:00 David Bolton <davidkbol...@gmail.com>:

> Marc,
>
> There is one use case where I wished that I could set the multi-measures
> manually: copying only a few instruments from the full score into
> MuseScore.
>
> Scenario 1:
> You get an orchestral trumpet part in D but your trumpeters are not good
> enough to transpose from sight. This is common in the educational
> setting, but I've even redone parts for musicians in professional
> orchestras. When you get to a multi-measure rest, you have to leave
> multiple blank measures (that are easy to miscount). It also creates a
> visual difference between the part you are copying to what you see on
> the screen (which makes errors more common).
>
> Scenario 2:
> You want to make editorial/artistic changes to section of the score.
> Perhaps your changes only affect the brass section, so you only input
> that section of the score in to MuseScore rather than the full score.
> When you get to a multi-measure rest, you have the same problems as
> scenario 1 above.
>
> There are ways to use MuseScore as it currently exists for these
> scenarios. For example you could add the multi-measures at the very end
> after you've added all the notes (by inserting exactly the number of
> measures you need for each multi-measure rest). However, making multiple
> passes on input is something I try to avoid since it is so prone to
> mistakes.
>
> In summary, the current implementation of multi-measure rests is ideal
> when you are working with full scores. But manually setting
> multi-measure rests is ideal when you are working with only part of a
> full score.
>
> David
>
>
>
> On 3/14/2016 9:00 PM, Marc Sabatella wrote:
> > That sounds much *harder* to me, not easier at all.  How is going to
> > all that trouble easier than just pressing "M"?  Or, better yet,
> > having created automatically for you when you generate parts from your
> > scores?  They break autmatically at double bars and other significant
> > events, so the "specific" mutlimeasure rests normally happen
> > completely automatically, and in cases where for some unusual reaosn
> > you want to break a multimeasure rest but *not* have a double bar or
> > other marked there (this is very rare), you can do this as well, via
> > Measure Properties.
> >
> > I'd recommend you maybe ask about how to use multimmeasure rests on
> > the forum, and then I think you'll probably find the system actually
> > does work extremely well, and you'll be able to find more suitable
> > GSoC project.  That's my personal opinion, anyhow.
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 6:47 PM Joyce Yom <yom.jo...@gmail.com
> > <mailto:yom.jo...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hello!
> >
> >     My name is Joyce Yom, and I'm a sophomore studying Computer
> >     Science at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. I only heard about
> >     GSOC just a few days ago, otherwise I would have contacted
> >     MuseScore a LOT earlier.
> >
> >     I do not have much experience with Qt, but I have extensive
> >     experience with C++, which is what I prefer to code in.
> >
> >     I was wondering if for my project, I could implement an easier way
> >     to notate multiple measure rests.Currently, the only way to
> >     implement these is adding them in at the end by checking the box
> >     for "Create multimeasure rests" under the Style menu, or to create
> >     split measure rests, clicking on the start of the measure where
> >     you want to split, go to measure properties, and check "break
> >     multimeasure rest".
> >
> >     I feel that this is very inconvenient regardless because firstly,
> >     this method isn't very apparent and easy to find (unless you do
> >     some Googling), and while it can be convenient in that it's
> >     automated for you, there isn't a manual setting for multimeasure
> >     rests either.
> >
> >     I would like to propose implementing an additional method for
> >     multimeasure rests, in which you can give two inputs, the measure
> >     number where the rest starts and the measure number to which you
> >     rest, and it creates a multimeasure rest for you, and another
> >     where you can select multiple empty measure, and go under Measure
> >     Properties in order to concatenate them all into on single
> >     multimeasure rest.
> >
> >     This can be a kinda picky thing to nitpick at, but I feel like It
> >     would make something a lot easier if you are creating a score
> >     based off of something handwritten, and the composer is very
> >     specific about measure rests, for whichever reason. I also feel
> >     like this way is more natural, rather than going under the style
> >     menu. I was surprised there wasn't a Rest option under Palettes!
> >
> >     I hope to hear feedback!
> >
> >     Sincerely,
> >     Joyce
> >
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     Transform Data into Opportunity.
> >     Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
> >     Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
> >     Click to learn more.
> >
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785231&iu=/4140_______________________________________________
> >     Mscore-developer mailing list
> >     Mscore-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
> >     <mailto:Mscore-developer@lists.sourceforge.net>
> >     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Transform Data into Opportunity.
> > Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
> > Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
> > Click to learn more.
> > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785231&iu=/4140
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mscore-developer mailing list
> > Mscore-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Transform Data into Opportunity.
> Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
> Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
> Click to learn more.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785231&iu=/4140
> _______________________________________________
> Mscore-developer mailing list
> Mscore-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transform Data into Opportunity.
Accelerate data analysis in your applications with
Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library.
Click to learn more.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=278785231&iu=/4140
_______________________________________________
Mscore-developer mailing list
Mscore-developer@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer

Reply via email to