I am about to embark on a project to provide the Open Source community with
suitably licensed quality sample sets, which are currently the main bugbear
to producing soundfonts or SFZ's for OS music applications.

The Licence type is of vital importance to ensuring that these sample sets
are available to use in any FOSS music application.

The MIT makes sense for applications and other computer programmes, but its
wording isn't a good fit for sample sets or other media which aren't "code".

As far as I can see the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Licence (CC-BY-4.0) fulfils this role, but I want to consult the considered
opinion of the MuseScore developers before I make a commitment to this
licence which will not easily be revoked.



-----
Regards
Michael
--
View this message in context: 
http://dev-list.musescore.org/CC-BY-compatible-with-GPL-v2-tp7579992.html
Sent from the MuseScore Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are 
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, 
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity 
planning reports. http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
_______________________________________________
Mscore-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer

Reply via email to