Hallo Martin, Du schriebst am Sat, 11 Aug 2012 06:34:14 +0200:
> which is OK for me. If the RPM makes copies of *.so's in users home > directory, it probably should change the owner to the users ID. > Or did I not understand the problem? You stated quite well how it should work. And rpm _does_ work that way - if root installs a package, it usually is installed system-wide. If a user installs a package, it's installed for that user only, and he probabely will have to override the installation path with something he desires. BTW, there's no problem with overwriting a file brought in with a package - it's still there, within the package, anyway. You can test for modifications, and the rpm packager can decide whether a reinstall should rewrite the file in its original state or leave it alone, keeping the modified version. -- (Weitergabe von Adressdaten, Telefonnummern u.ä. ohne Zustimmung nicht gestattet, ebenso Zusendung von Werbung oder ähnlichem) ----------------------------------------------------------- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, S. Schicktanz ----------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
