On Tuesday 12 November 2013 13:25:05 Martin Schreiber wrote: > > if c >= 0 then //I am not happy with that additional check > for a in 0..c do > b:= b + ar[a] > end > end; > " or " for a in 0 to c do b:= b + ar[a] end; for a in c downto 0 do b:= b + ar[a] end; " -> '..' in ranges would be replaced by 'to', " type subrangetype = 1..10; -> subrangetype = 1 to 10; "
Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
