On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Martin Schreiber <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thursday 21 November 2013 13:48:37 Marcos Douglas wrote: > >> >> WOW! Exotic too much and worse then use "result" variable. >> > >> > Why? It shows clearly that it is a write only variable which can not be >> > read and can't be forgotten to set. >> >> "end" is a reserved word, not a variable so it can't receive a value! >> Better to use "return" or continue using "result", IMO. >> > 'end' here is the end of the procedure block with starts with a result type > definition: > " > sub func1(): int32; > begin > end:= 123; > "
I did understand and I continue disagreeing. > which means assign the sub block with a value. Not that bad when the shock is > over. ;-) I don't think so. :/ -- Marcos Douglas ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation. Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
