On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 5:34 AM, Michael Schnell <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/22/2013 09:26 AM, Martin Schreiber wrote: >> >> Use 'method' instead of 'sub' everywhere or introduce a new keyword? >> > Everywhere.
But here are two different worlds: Procedural vs. OO. IMHO we should not combine the two things. So if procedural is an "old world" we use an "old word" called "function" or "function". This word, using the same abbreviation, speak more than 'sub'. > I decently dislike "sub". For me, a keyword should be "speaking" (like > "to" or "for") and not be an abbreviation. "method" is a lot shorter > than "subroutine" and more speaking than "sub". I agree. But, in that context, I will be happy using 'method' or 'function' to class methods. -- Marcos Douglas ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation. Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing conversations that shape the rapidly evolving mobile landscape. Sign up now. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=63431311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
