On Monday 01 October 2018 18:29:32 mohamed hamza wrote: > In all case length ( fieldfiltervalue) <> field.size : fieldfiltervalue > is trimed. > Fieldfiltervalue is the value the user entered. As I wrote before padding is problematic because new and modified char(n) fields are not padded -> the filter will not work. Why don't you want to use varchr(n) fields instead which don't suffer from this problem? They also use less memory in record buffer. If you insist to pad the filter values do it yourself in "beforeendfilteredit".
Martin _______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
