Hello fredvs, you wrote on Sun, 8 Mar 2020 06:10:57 -0700 (MST):
> Here the line with problems: > > ---> if fld1 is tblobfield and (self.fblobintf <> nil) then begin > > Changing, as workaround with: > > ---> if (self.fblobintf <> nil) then begin > > Makes fpc 3.3.1 trunk happy. But loses the plausibility control. I'd rather suggest parentheizing the first partial expression, like so: if (fld1 is tblobfield) and (self.fblobintf <> nil) then begin This way, there's no ambiguity about operator application, and both partial expressions evaluate to type "boolean", so the "and" will be satisfied and evaluated correctly. If that's a solution to the problem, the reason was an ambiguity in operator precedence - "and" regarded higher then "is". -- -- (Weitergabe von Adressdaten, Telefonnummern u.ä. ohne Zustimmung nicht gestattet, ebenso Zusendung von Werbung oder ähnlichem) ----------------------------------------------------------- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, S. Schicktanz ----------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ mseide-msegui-talk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mseide-msegui-talk
