Thanks Kevin!
That makes perfect sense now.

Regards,
Sven

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Kevin Holman
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 12:47 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [msmom] RE: SCOM 2012 SP1 - dual Gateways - Change Primary Management 
Server turns agents gray

By design.

When you add another GW at a location, the agents DO NOT know about it.  Agents 
- when assigned to a gateway, get a config XML file locally that will ONLY 
contain that assigned GW as a possible parent.  You must manually, via 
powershell, make those agents reporting to a GW be "aware" of the secondary 
gateways that they are allowed to fail over to.

What you are experiencing is called "orphaning agents" because you assigne them 
to another healthservice, but since they don't know about that HS - they never 
will communicate with it and will continue to communicate with the original GW. 
 However, since this original GW was not assigned as a failover, it rejects 
them, hence the HB failures and lack of communication, until at which time you 
assign them back, and they are no longer rejected by the original GW.


When you have multiple GW's in a site for agent based failover and load 
balancing, you must assign the agents to their GW via PowerShell, and provide 
the failover GW server as a param:

See:   http://blogs.technet.com/b/jimmyharper/archive/2012/01/09/3346309.aspx





From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sven Wells
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2014 11:38 AM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [msmom] SCOM 2012 SP1 - dual Gateways - Change Primary Management 
Server turns agents gray

Hello,

We have 3 data centers that are geographically remote from the SCOM 2012 SP1 
database servers (and management severs).  At each of these 3 data centers we 
built 1-Gateway Server.  Each of these Gateway servers manages at least 200 
agents.

We decided to build a 2nd Gateway server at each of these 3 remote data 
centers, so that we could offload 50% of the agents onto the newly built 2nd 
Gateway servers.

After the 2nd Gateways were built about a month ago (at least 8months after the 
initial Gateways), we've now started "Changing primary management server" for 
50% of the agents.  We started small, selecting 5-8 agents at a time, then 
waiting 30mins or so.  Most (about 90%) of the agents we've attempted so far, 
go from a Green/Healthy state to a Gray/UnHealthy state within that 30mins, and 
never become healthy.  If we move those agents back, they become Green/Healthy 
again.

The Gateway servers and the agents they manage are all located in the same AD 
Domain, so everything is trusted.  No DMZ/Untrusted relationships in place for 
this.\

Any idea why 'moving' these agents between two co-located Gateway Servers, in 
the same AD Domain (both agents and GWs are in the same Domain), is turning 
them gray?
Oh, I've also attempted to "Repair" these agents, but to no avail.

Thanks,
Sven

Sven Wells
SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATION SPECIALIST
Communication and Infrastructure Services
TIP - Technology, Innovation and Performance

PPD
Wilmington NC HQ

Phone +1 910 558 6870
[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>www.ppdi.com
<http://www.ppdi.com/>
PPD LSS Yellow Belt

[cid:[email protected]]


This email transmission and any documents, files or previous email messages 
attached to it may contain information that is confidential or legally 
privileged.
If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering 
this transmission to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that you must not read this transmission and that any disclosure, copying, 
printing, distribution or use of this transmission is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the 
sender by telephone or return email and delete the original transmission and 
its attachments without reading or saving in any manner.



This email transmission and any documents, files or previous email messages 
attached to it may contain information that is confidential or legally 
privileged. 
If you are not the intended recipient or a person responsible for delivering 
this transmission to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
that you must not read this transmission and that any disclosure, copying, 
printing, distribution or use of this transmission is strictly prohibited. 
If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify the 
sender by telephone or return email and delete the original transmission and 
its attachments without reading or saving in any manner.



Reply via email to