On 2017-03-24, Bob von Knobloch <b...@vknobloch.de> wrote:
> On 23/03/17 15:10, David W. Schultz wrote:
>> The family guides have complete descriptions. In this case slau144.
>
> Thanks David, I seem to have missed that, it is indeed a proper description.
> Thanks for all the help. The TI compiler is still no good - the
> interrupts are still taking much longer that the old compiler and the
> code size is still much bigger.
After seeing the mess they made of Code Composter, I can't say I'm
surprised they've mulched the gcc port.
> The enhancements that I wanted to do to the target can, seemingly, only
> be achieved with the old compiler at this time.
>
> I'll give up on the TI one and keep looking in case it improves.
I predict it will get worse and worse until it gets forked and
somebody else fixes it.
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! Is my fallout shelter
at termite proof?
gmail.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Mspgcc-users mailing list
Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
