you can use 3.0.X, but not 3.1.X not 3.2, 3.3, 3.4...
On Thu, 05 Sep 2002 21:39:54 -0300 "Garst R. Reese" <re...@isn.net> wrote: > The gurus can say better than I, but in CVS gcc there is a 3.1 version, > which the docs say is unsupported. Reasons are given. Try it, test it, > report good-bad news. > I just downloaded gcc-core-3.0.tar.gz from gnu.org and use that, tho my > main compiler is 3.2. > Garst > > Galen Seitz wrote: > > > > Should I stick with the original gcc 3.0 release, or can I use something > > more current (3.0.x, etc.)? > > > > thanks, > > galen > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old > cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! > https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 > _______________________________________________ > Mspgcc-users mailing list > Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users > > > /******************************************************************** ("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._ (\ Dimmy the Wild UA1ACZ `6_ 6 ) `-. ( ).`-.__.`) Enterprise Information Sys (_Y_.)' ._ ) `._ `. ``-..-' Nevsky prospekt, 20 / 44 _..`--'_..-_/ /--'_.' ,' Saint Petersburg, Russia (il),-'' (li),' ((!.-' +7 (812) 3468202, 5585314 ********************************************************************/
