Hi Steve, On Sunday 22 December 2002 18:12, Steve Underwood wrote: > I guess this one is mostly for Dmitry..... > > I have been building mspgcc based upon gcc 3.2. Are there any problems > if 3.2.1 is used? It is essentially a bug fix release, so it sounds like > progress. You never can tell until you try, though :-) > 3.2.1 - no probs at all. 3.3 will not work unless some certain job done.
> The current mspgcc gdb stuff is for gdb 5.1.1. Does anyone know how much > is different in the latest gdb, that might break the current mspgcc > stuff? It seems like there is real merit in using the latest gdb. > What's the advantage of newer gdb? > Lastly, I guess, would moving to the latest binutils create much work? I > think this one is less interesting, as I am not aware of it offering > much of value to us. > I doubt there will be any advantages. If there will which ones? cheers, ~d > Regards, > Steve > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Mspgcc-users mailing list > Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users -- ********************************************************************* ("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._ (\ Dimmy the Wild UA1ACZ `6_ 6 ) `-. ( ).`-.__.`) Enterprise Information Sys (_Y_.)' ._ ) `._ `. ``-..-' Nevsky prospekt, 20 / 44 _..`--'_..-_/ /--'_.' ,' Saint Petersburg, Russia (il),-'' (li),' ((!.-' +7 (812) 314-8860, 5585314 *********************************************************************
