Hi Garst,
If you had to modify binutils it sounds like you found more problems
than you previously posted. In that case, please do post the patches.
Sample 169s have existed for a couple of months. The first ones have a
serious problem or two. As long as you avoid those you will find a chip
where the new modules - DAC12 and DMA - seem to work OK. I have run some
simple programs on a 169, but I built those with another compiler. I
haven't tried the mspgcc support since Dmitry added it. Clearly, I had
typos in my header file :-( I'm not clear what problems there would be
with the binutils stuff, though. Is this just something like further
typos in the memory definitions?
I am preparing a bunch of header updates, that I should commit in a day
or so. I found too many definitions like
#define A B+C+D
which should really be
#define A (B+C+D)
I hit a problem in a real program that finally made me go through all
the headers and clean this up.
Regards,
Steve
Garst R. Reese wrote:
I've fixed up the .h files and added the missing parts in binutils (the
gcc stuff had already be done). The example timerA_uart compiles for the
msp430f169 and f155.
I can send patches if you want them. Samples of the chips are not yet
available, so there is no big rush.
Garst
