> Fellows,
> I would like to know if somebody uses some macros from iomacros.h.
> I am going to remove them as soos as 3.3 will be released in order to
avoid
> annoying warnings.
I use "critical" and "nop", but they are just simple abbreviations so I have
no problems with defining them myself in my own header files.
Incidently, are there any really significant changes in gcc 3.3/3.4 ? From
what I have read, there are some changes to the way include paths are
searched (which should be fairly irrelevant to the simpler structure of most
msp430-size projects), and some fancier optomisers for big cpus. Is there
any particular reason to switch, other than that it is easier for you to
maintain a single branch?
mvh.
David
>
> If I will not get any replies I'll change it as my test :)
>
> ~d
>
>
> --
> /********************************************************************
> ("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._ (\ Dimmy the Wild UA1ACZ
> `6_ 6 ) `-. ( ).`-.__.`) Enterprise Information Sys
> (_Y_.)' ._ ) `._ `. ``-..-' Nevsky prospekt, 20 / 44
> _..`--'_..-_/ /--'_.' ,' Saint Petersburg, Russia
> (il),-'' (li),' ((!.-' +7 (812) 3468202, 5585314
> ********************************************************************/
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte
> are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE
> Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues.
> http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en
> _______________________________________________
> Mspgcc-users mailing list
> Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
>
>
