Sorry, I'll repost this with HTML off ;-)

Hi,
 
I think Oleg has identified a real problem.
Lets leave the question of "is this the best way to do it" aside and realise 
that "this is the best way to reproduce the problem"!
 
The swap() function is not swapping pointers it is swapping the contents of 
structures.
This is a valid operation and it produces some interesting code! 
Clearly the code attached is wrong.
 
Regards
Luke
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Roberto G. Berner [mailto:booleangene...@ciudad.com.ar] 
Sent: Thursday, 23 January 2003 4:36 AM
To: mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [Mspgcc-users] Struct assignment BUG...
 
Dear Oleg:
 
Accept my apologies, but I think you should check this. If I am wrong, please 
excuse me.
 
 
struct x{                /* struct of type x defined */
int a,b,c,d;
};
 
struct x *v[2];    /* array of 2 pointers to structures of type x - somewhere 
initialized, OK ?*/
 
/* swap pointers, this means after call to swap(), v[0] holds the pointer to 
v[1] and viceversa */
void swap(void)    {
struct x tmp;    /*  this declaraction should be struct x *tmp , and not the 
variable tmp of type struct x !!! */
 tmp=*v[0];        /* tmp should be a pointer in order to hold pointers 
properly */
 *v[0]=*v[1];
 *v[1]=tmp;
}
 
Kind regards,
 
Roberto G. Berner
booleangene...@ciudad.com.ar
ven...@increible.homelinux.com
4308 3500 tel
4308 3700 fax
15 5122 6095 cel
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Oleg Skydan 
To: mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net 
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 4:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Mspgcc-users] Struct assignment BUG...
 
Dear Roberto,
 
The swap function exchanges the contents of the two structs,
pointed by elements of the array v, so there a significant BUG.
 
I have omitted the initialization section for simplicity (I have found this BUG 
in 
a real program, which is very large).
 
Anyway the stack pointer should point to the same location at the function 
exit and entry (unless it is explicitly changed, using asm statement for 
example).
 
Thanks,
Oleg.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Roberto G. Berner 
To: mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net 
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 6:25 PM
Subject: RE: [Mspgcc-users] Struct assignment BUG...
 
Dear Oleg:
 
I think that there is no bug. Should I suggest trying ...
 
struct x *tmp;
 
Kind regards,
 
Roberto G. Berner
booleangene...@ciudad.com.ar
ven...@increible.homelinux.com
4308 3500 tel
4308 3700 fax
15 5122 6095 cel
----- Original Message ----- 
From: Oleg Skydan 
To: MSP430 GCC 
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:12 PM
Subject: [Mspgcc-users] Struct assignment BUG...
 
Hello, All !
 
I found a significant BUG when using struct assignment.
 
Here is the sample:
 
struct x{
int a,b,c,d;
};
 
struct x *v[2];
 
void swap(void)
{
struct x tmp;
 tmp=*v[0];
 *v[0]=*v[1];
 *v[1]=tmp;
}
 
And here is GCC's listing (with -O option):
 
/***********************
 * Function `swap' 
 ***********************/
swap:
/* prologue: frame size = 8 */
.L__FrameSize_swap=0x8
.L__FrameOffset_swap=0x8
 sub #8, r1 ; 8, fpn 0
/* prologue end (size=1) */
 mov &v, r15 
 mov @r15+, @r1
 mov @r15+, 2(r1)
 mov @r15+, 4(r1)
 mov @r15+, 6(r1)
 mov &v+2, r14 
 mov @r14+, 0(r15)
 mov @r14+, 2(r15)
 mov @r14+, 4(r15)
 mov @r14+, 6(r15)
 mov &v+2, r15 
 mov @r1+, 0(r15)       ;We should not change the stack pointer here !
 mov @r1+, 2(r15)
 mov @r1+, 4(r15)
 mov @r1+, 6(r15)
/* epilogue: frame size=8 */
 add #8, r1                    ;After this command the stack pointer points to 
the illegal location !
 ret
/* epilogue end (size=2) */
/* function swap size 33 (30) */
 
I use win32 version (from 10.12.2002).
Thanks, Oleg.
 
 

____
This communication contains information which is confidential and the copyright 
of Nautronix. 

If you are not the intended recipient of this communication please delete and 
destroy all copies and advise Nautronix immediately. If you are the intended 
recipient of this communication you should not copy, disclose or distribute 
this communication without the prior authority of Nautronix. Any views 
expressed in this Communication are those of the individual sender, except 
where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Nautronix.

Except as required at law, Nautronix does not represent, warrant and/or 
guarantee that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that 
the communication is free of errors, virus, interception or interference.


Reply via email to