Hi Matthew, A common approach is do include a main() with your library, with calls after some sort of initialization another main, in this case your XM_main(). Create some kind of startup.c and a startup.h with the definition of extern int XM_main(argc,argv...) in it.
Afaik this is done in MFC/Win32 (-> WinMain() ) or NutMain (on NutOs <V3.0) But what do you dislike in overriding with the help of the .init segment? Greetings /Marc > -----Original Message----- > From: mspgcc-users-ad...@lists.sourceforge.net > [mailto:mspgcc-users-ad...@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf > Of matthew.c...@tekelek.com.au > Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 6:13 AM > To: mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [Mspgcc-users] alternative main() > > > Is there any way I can redefine the call to main() with > another function > without over riding the startup proceedure ? At the end of the > application startup I would like to call my own function > XM_main() instead of main(). Is this possible, am I making sense ? > > Cheers > > Matthew > Design Engineer > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Tekelek Pty Ltd > Australia > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies! > Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive > scholarships. Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, > Linux/UNIX, and more. www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp > _______________________________________________ > Mspgcc-users mailing list > Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users >
