On Tuesday 06 May 2003 09:13, Steve Underwood wrote:
> The biggest code size differences comes the moment you include a
> floating point calculation.

Well, Steve,
Currently, I'm running quite a big task on 1232 which requires just a couple 
fp manipulations.
So, native gcc's fp support gives (overal) 5192 bytes of code size.
When compiling with my -lfp the size reduced to 4980.
This is not dramatically, but removing some more singularities checks from 
libfp will yeld even less code size (I actually do this, cause I know numbers 
a-priori and overall fp stuff is _twice_ less then).

Cheers,
~d
P.S. your compilers comparisons are very interesting. Can you show more 
numbers with, if possible, srcs? (this may gimme a hint to write some more 
optimizations :)


-- 
/********************************************************************
     ("`-''-/").___..--''"`-._     (\   Dimmy the Wild      UA1ACZ
      `6_ 6  )   `-.  (     ).`-.__.`)  Enterprise Information Sys 
      (_Y_.)'  ._   )  `._ `. ``-..-'   Nevsky prospekt,   20 / 44
    _..`--'_..-_/  /--'_.' ,'           Saint Petersburg,   Russia
   (il),-''  (li),'  ((!.-'             +7 (812)  3468202, 5585314
 ********************************************************************/


Reply via email to