Hi Garst,
Getting access to 169 is no problem. However, the 1610 and 1611 are not
out yet. Getting access to those is a little harder :-{
Regards,
Steve
Garst R. Reese wrote:
Hi Steve,
How are you getting access to some 169s. I have a project built on 149s
that
could desparately use more ram (1611s).
For reference, I am using Linux.
Steve Underwood wrote:
Hi Tom,
I tried a 169 during the testing of gdbproxy, and it was OK. I'll try it
again next week, when I have access to some 169s to retest it with. Just
for reference, are you using Linux or Windows?
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Mspgcc-users mailing list
Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
