Thank you.

        --John

On Monday 20 October 2003 07:43 am, Dmitry wrote:
> Yeah,
> there was an odd thing --
> somehow some important defines were missed after code reorganisation.
>
> I co'ed changes.
>
> here is a patch against CVS' gcc-3.3 attached.
> gcc-current is not affected by this bug.
> ~d


Reply via email to