Georg Ritter wrote: > > ... > > > >>do you write FAT filesystem or a custom format and is your code open > >>source? > > > > At present there is no filesystem, it just writes 512 byte blocks, but > > it skips the first one. If I need a fs, I I'll probably use romfs, found > > on linux. > Hi, > > I heard some rumours that M$ is going to change their attitude to the usage > of FAT. It seems they want to turn down everything/everyone that does not > pay for a licence in future. > > I was loooking into the MMC part too, and therefore was looking for a suitable > fs. It should be free and easier to write. But it should also be somehow > read/write-able by various OSes. Did really find anything yet. > > Greetzs, > > Georg Well, romfs is so simple that it could easily be ported to other OSes. For my purposes, the fact that it is ro on linux is a benefit. FAT sucks anyway, and I really doubt if it is useable on an MSP until the f1611 comes out of vapourware.
Garst > > > .... > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > _______________________________________________ > Mspgcc-users mailing list > Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
