> Greetings,
>
> I was attempting to ask if function placement matters with respect to
> optimization.
>
I think this sort of re-arrangement of function calls was introduced in
gcc3.3, and is enabled when doing heavy optomisation with -O3 (I guess it's
quite time consuming on large files).
> For instance:
>
> -- Ex 1--------------------------------------------------------
> void functionX();
>
> functionY() { functionX(); /*note functionX is below in the file*/ }
>
> functionX() { bla bla }
>
> ---Ex 2----------------------- -------------------
>
> static void functionX() { bla bla }
>
> functionY() { functionX(); /*X is above in the file */ }
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> I had the prejudice that compilers might be more willing to
> optimize Ex 2.
>
> Regards,
> Jody
>
> >i'm not clear about what you're asking.
> >conditional compilation? it does.
>
>
> On Tuesday 06 April 2004 17:59, Baudoin, Jody (MED, GEMS-IT) wrote:
> > Greetings wise ones,
> >
> > Question: Does optimization occur within a file conditional upon
> > relative placement of caller & called functions?
> >
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
> Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
> GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Mspgcc-users mailing list
> Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users
>
>
>
