well,
actually, yes, helloads of warnings (except one) are expected.
probably you build gcc-3.2 by 3.3 or something like that.
~d

On Monday 12 April 2004 18:56, Claudio Grasso wrote:
> On gcc build stage. I'll rebuild everything and send the whole detail.
>
> Thanx a lot.
>
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Dima [mailto:d...@radio.rphf.spbstu.ru]
> Enviado el: Lunes, 12 de Abril de 2004 11:37 a.m.
> Para: mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Asunto: Re: [Mspgcc-users] Many warnings building toolchain.
>
> hmmm.....
>
> is it on gcc build stage?
> or libc? or something?
>
> ~d
>
> On Monday 12 April 2004 18:24, Claudio Grasso wrote:
> > Hi all!
> > Finally I decided I should be man enough to build the toolchain myself :)
> > I used Red Hat 9 and followed carefully manual's instruction. Although
> > building of MSP430-GCC and MSP430-GDB ended successfully, I got many
> > warnings concerning length of strings, abort function being implicitly
> > defined and many other string functions (strlen and others) being also
> > implicitly defined. Is it normal or should I send a more detailed log to
> > figure out what is going on. Its quite long so I decided to ask before
> > sending it. I think I remember Dmitry warned that some warnings are to be
> > expected by I couldn't find that posting in the archives.
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> >                             Claudio
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
> Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
> GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Mspgcc-users mailing list
> Mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mspgcc-users

Reply via email to