Hello from Gregg C Levine
As a matter of fact, if this is the board I am thinking about, then
yes. The Adam Dunkels TCIP Stack, was ported to it. By someone else,
his pages say. That does not mean we can't go ahead, and reproduce
that work. We are talking about the board made by that company, which
has a standard 10BASE-T connector on it?
-------------------
Gregg C Levine hansolofal...@worldnet.att.net
------------------------------------------------------------
"The Force will be with you...Always." Obi-Wan Kenobi
"Use the Force, Luke."  Obi-Wan Kenobi

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mspgcc-users-ad...@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:mspgcc-users-
> ad...@lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf Of matthias jahn
> Sent: Saturday, May 01, 2004 5:26 AM
> To: mspgcc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Mspgcc-users] strange behaviour of the tcpip example
> 
> Am Donnerstag, 29. April 2004 22:12 schrieb Chris Liechti:
> > matthias jahn wrote:
> > > I tried to test the tcpip example from the cvs with a msp430f149
board.
> > > It configures, builds, uploads and starts fine.
> > >
> > > It did not work with my Linux-Box (no ping, no web)
> > > But if i use a Windows-Box or put a router/firewall between it
runes as
> > > expected.
> >
> > that could be a 10/100Mbit/s auto-negotiation issue. the msp430
board
> > probably understands only 10mit/s but your linux box only wants to
talk
> > 100mbit/s, maybe...
> Thats not the problem. I have another linux box with a old 10MBit
only network
> card.
> The sympton is equal. It did not work if tried it with linux in
direct
> connection.
> If i use the same box with windows or put a nat router between it
runes as
> expected.
> 
> 
> Is there a nother ip stack ported to mspgcc? (Think of Adam Dunkels
tcpip
> Stack)


Reply via email to