Hi John,
I don't understand what you mean. I said the latest gdbproxy supports
everything released to date, so a new variant is no problem at all. The
FG43x parts work OK with gdbproxy. If you got the result shown below,
you didn't get the latest gdbproxy from ftp.opencall.org
Regards,
Steve
John Griessen wrote:
I'm a new user.
I got this far using my TI FET kit and the mspgcc pages and
http://www.mikrocontroller.net/mspgcc.en.htm
The mikrocontroller.net page is essential for beginners, please point to
it from all other beginner howto fragments.
Does this mean my choice of a new variant stopped me?
Is the pyjtag open method such that we can add new types by templating
from existing ones?
How does it compare to gdbproxy?
debug: msp430: msp430_open()
info: msp430: Target device is a 'Device unknown' (type 0)
notice: msp430-gdbproxy: waiting on TCP port 2000
On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 20:03, Steve Underwood wrote:
Get the latest gdbproxy from ftp://ftp.opencall.org/pub That version
supports everything released to date.
